HISTORICAL FACTS ABOUT
BHUTAN AND BHUTANESE
KING
Accepts:
In his foreword to the revised edition of
‘BHUTAN”, a book first published in 1972 and written by Nagendra Singh, one
time Constitutional Advisor to the Royal Government of Bhutan from 1970 until
his election as a judge of the International Court of Justice in 1972, King
Jigme Singye Wangchuk of Bhutan has evidently accepted that today’s Bhutan was
a tutelage of Kamarupa, Assam (India), until 650 A.D and the northern Bhutanese
including the present dynasty migrated to Bhutan from Tibet. So the ruling
elite of Bhutan are as much migrants as
any other communities that make up the Bhutanese nation, and they are no more
or less threatened out of extinction as any other ethnic groups.
IMMIGRANTS
FROM TIBET
After the death of Bhaskaraverma, the ruler of
Kamarupa, the tutelage of Kamarupa, today’s Bhutan, got separated from Kamarupa
only to expose itself to incursions from
Tibet which swept the country in about 861-900 A.D (“BHUTAN’ by Nagendra
Singh 1978:18.) Prior to this, there were no Tibetans (Bhuteas) in today’s Bhutan. Those Tibetans who
swarmed Bhutan liked it so much they
refused to return to Tibet and such deserters were
called “Milog”. More influx followed from Tibet and these immigrants
began settling in today’s Bhutan without any edict from
Indian rulers who were ruling this area until 8th century. Those
immigrants were mainly attracted by better ECONOMIC conditions of this Indian
ruled area.
OUSTING
INDIAN RULERS
Later, these migrants succeeded in gradually
ousting the Indian rulers and their subjects and today no descendants of the
Indian rulers are present in Bhutan who, by virtue of their
being original inhabitants, could have labelled all migrants to Bhutan as ‘illegal immigrants”.
However, we have a situation where descendants of earlier immigrants with the
reins of State power labeling the descendants of later immigrants as economic
and illegal migrants and evicting them from their motherland, Bhutan, to become refugees. What
an irony?
IMMIGRATION
OF TIBETAN LAMAS
Historical evidence suggests that since 13th
century AD onwards, some prominent lamas like Gyalwa Lanangpa, Phago Drugom
Shigpo, longchhenpa Drime Ozer, Barawa Gyaltshen Passang, Kuenga Pajo etc. from
Tibet started immigrating to
today’s Bhutan and started ruling this
area with each lama holding sway over small principalities. Later in 17th
century AD, all those territories were united by a monk named Zhabdrung Nawanag
Namgyal, who immigrated to this area in 1616 AD from Ralung in Tibet. He ruled this unified
nation under a theocratic system which in many ways still persist in Bhutan through “Driglam Namza”
but under internationally more acceptable guise of “Unique Democracy”.
MONARCHY
AND WAYS OF RULING IN BHUTAN
Although the system of monarchy in Bhutan was established in 1907,
the ruling system persisted as that of medieval theocracy and the people were
subjected to arbitrary rule and their existence was painful and difficult. In this difficult situation, the people from
southern Bhutan defied the authorities and dared to form a political party
called “Jai Gorkha” under the guidance of late Sahabir Rai to address their
grievances against discrimination and oppression and organized a mass peaceful
rally at Dagana, Bhutan, in 1947. This party was brutally crushed down by the
regime with the help of India by killing Mahasur Chhetry, one of the leaders
from Chirang, Bhutan and high premium was put on the head of late Sahabir
Rai. Following this, another Political
Party “Bhutan State Congress” under the presidentship of Late D. B. Gurung was
formed in 4th November
1952
to address the same grievance as that of advanced “Jai Gorkha”.
FIRST
TIME CITIZENSHIP IN BHUTAN
Because of the protest of those two political
parties, the then rulers of Bhutan were forced to re-think
their policies and hence, promulgated laws for the first time to grant
citizenship to all Bhutanese domiciled in Bhutan on or before 31st
December 1958
through a resolution of the National Assembly (No. 3, 11th session,
1958 and No.8, 11th session, 1958). And the census record was
maintained by the village heads called Mandals until 1968 when the Ministry of
Home Affairs of Bhutan was established.
REGIME’S
ETHNIC CLEANSING MOVE
All Bhutanese, irrespective of their regional or
ethnic affiliations, lived in peace and harmony. And they all contributed
equally to the nation building process until late 1980s. But the rulers of Bhutan shook them out of their
blissful life when they began implementing discriminatory and suppressive
policies and conducting irrational census exercises only in southern Bhutan in 1988 targeting only
the Bhutanese of Gorkha/Nepalese ethnicity. With strong inbuilt intention of
ethnic cleansing, this illogical census forcefully disqualified many bona-fide
Bhutanese citizens of Gorkha/Nepalese ethnicity and labeled them as ECONOMIC
MIGRANTS. Such discriminatory policy of the rulers was resented by the
bona-fide Bhutanese and they organized mass peaceful rallies in southern Bhutan in 1990 and in eastern Bhutan in 1997 to express their
grievances. Both the rallies were brutally crushed down by the regime which
instantly labeled those demonstrators as ANTI-NATIONAL and TERRORIST. And later they were labeled as ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
to make their propaganda sound more imposing and realistic. Surprisingly, such
dirty propaganda of the Bhutanese rulers seems to suit the powers with vested
interest to see the plight of the Bhutanese refugees continue.
DECEPTIVE
PROPAGANDA OF REGIME
In the mid 90s, when the international pressure on
Bhutan vis-a-vis the refugee
issue grew stronger, the rulers of Bhutan accepted the truth of its
bona-fide citizens living as refugees in eastern Nepal. It proposed to
categorize and verify them before taking them back to Bhutan. But when time actually
came to take the verified ones to Bhutan, the ever cunning tyrant
rulers of Bhutan prevaricated and
successfully diverted world attention from the real issue of finding a solution
to the refugee problem with their self-serving slogan of “Gross National
Happiness”
It is a matter of great regret and shame that the
international community and many democratically elected leaders who have made
civil liberty and human rights their plank are found supporting gimmick of
doubtful worth of autocratic tyrant Bhutanese rulers at the cost of fundamental
rights of the Bhutanese citizens including respect for Human Rights in Bhutan.
GROSS
NATIONAL HAPPINESS IN BHUTAN ??
When speaking about “Gross National Happiness” in Bhutan, however, it is very
important to know whether the present rulers of Bhutan who evicted about 1/6th
of their citizens from the south and the east are still happy in Bhutan. And if indeed they believe so, they must at
the least accept themselves to be barbaric rulers of the medieval period ruling
Bhutan under a theocracy through
Driglam Namza. If they are not, coming up with such slogan of Gross National Happiness
is shameful and violating their conscience..
We ask how rational and conscious Bhutanese can
live happily in Bhutan:
-
when
more than one lakh of their fellow countrymen were evicted from their
motherland to become refugees just for raising voice against discrimination,
oppression and human rights violation in Bhutan;
-
when
they are not allowed to meet their evicted relatives by the rulers of Bhutan even on tragic occasion like the death of
their relatives;
-
when
the landed properties of their evicted relatives is distributed mostly to the
northerners;
-
when
the land of southern Bhutanese, still living in Bhutan is tactically declared excess by the land surveyors and
allotted to the northern Bhutanese with
inborn intention of creating misunderstanding between northern and southern
Bhutanese and ultimately displacing Bhutanese of Nepalese ethnicity;
-
when
vast area of northern Bhutan, about ten thousand
square kilometers is surrendered to China after confiscating vast
lands of evicted bona-fide southern Bhutanese;
-
when
tyrant Bhutanese rulers sign treaty with India to pile up plenty of arms
and ammunition just to subdue the genuine voices of the Bhutanese citizens at
present and in future;
-
when
once the Bhutanese rulers proposed to sacrifice one of the southern
districts to………? after resettling all
bona-fide Bhutanese of Nepalese
ethnicity in that particular
district. (Bhutanese refugees in Nepal by Prof. Mahendra P.
Lama, June 2007:22 );
-
when
their motherland, Bhutan is mortgaged only for the
welfare and security of the tyrant rulers;
-
when
many Bhutanese still living inside Bhutan express their desire to
resettle in third countries
-
when
no Bhutanese have right to raise voice against the existing human rights violation,
particularly after 1990 and when the rulers are working against the bonafide
Bhutanese and nation, Bhutan.
Without tackling the
pre-existing and structurally fostered gross human rights violation in Bhutan and addressing the
Bhutanese refugee issue, the catchy and attractive slogan like “Gross National
Happiness” is to lull the gullible outside and cover up one crime of the
Bhutanese rulers with another crime.
NATIONALISTIC
BHUTANESE
That the Bhutanese rulers lacked in nationalistic
feeling have been well manifested from the past when the then rulers of Bhutan
handed over vast tract of Bhutanese land from the east bank of river Teesta (in
India) to the west bank of river Jaldhaka (in Bhutan) along with 18 (eighteen)
Duars to British India in 1865 just to save themselves and remain in
power. Recently about 10 thousand square
kilometers along the northern boundary is surrendered to the Chinese so the
present rulers continue their tyrannically rule under the cover unique
democracy. Even in 2007, the rulers of
Bhutan thought to cede one of the southern districts of Bhutan after resettling
all bona-fide Bhutanese of Gorkhas/Nepalese ethnicity in that particular
district. Such attitude of Bhutanese rulers clearly reflects their
nationalistic feelings and demonstrates their love for the country. Hence,
rulers of Bhutan coming up with slogans
like “Gross National Happiness” in Bhutan are nothing but great
deception, particularly to Bhutan and to all nationalistic
Bhutanese. We are very sure their deception will be exposed before long in
future.
In contrast, the Bhutanese from the south and the
east have more ardent nationalistic feelings observed by their strong
determination to stay back in Bhutan despite discrimination,
oppression and their gross Human Rights violations by the regime. Even the
evicted Bhutanese proved their strong nationalistic feelings by living in
horrendous refugee camps situations and awaiting repatriation to their
motherland, Bhutan.
No law and religion has ever said that a country
belongs only to the rulers of the particular country. It belongs as much also
to the citizens who live in that country. So evicting the children of a
particular nation by the people in the power is a grievous crime. And in the
same breath one may say that the citizens of any nation easily forgetting their
nation and giving away their nationality are committing the biggest sin. So,
all the children of Bhutan, resettled anywhere in
the world are constantly reminded not to forget their motherland, Bhutan and work hard to return
with honour and dignity.
Dr. Bhampa Rai,
BRRRC.
No comments:
Post a Comment